“As to your dates, that is the
biggest mystification of all.” [CREE]
It's not often that we get a piece of Sherlockian scholarship
that had its origin in a mainstream publication. And in this case,
it's from one of the original Sherlockians.
In 1932, Ronald Knox set out to review two new Sherlockian
books, but he managed to turn it into an essay that was a master
class in chronology. It's just a Trifle.
And stay tuned, as we have some bonus content on Ronald Knox
for our supporters.
All of our supporters are eligible for our monthly drawings
for Baker Street Journals and bonus
content. Join our community on Patreon or Substack today.
This season, we've added "Trifling Trifles" — short-form
content that doesn't warrant a full episode — as an additional
channel of content exclusively for our paying
subscribers. Check it out (Patreon | Substack).
Do you have a topic you'd like to recommend? Email us at
trifles@ihearofsherlock.com and if we use your idea on the air,
we'll send you a thank-you gift.
You know the plots, but what about the minutiae? We delve into the Sherlock Holmes stories and provide answers to questions that arise, clarify muddy details, and look into some of the period terminology in this weekly podcast.